Article 1423

Obligations are civil or natural.  Civil obligations give right of action to compel their performance.  Natural obligations, not being based on positive law but on equity and natural law, do not grant a rigt of action to enforce their performance, but after voluntary fulfillment by the obligor, they authorize the retention of what has been delivered or rendered by reason thereof.  Some natural obligations are set forth in the following articles. (n)

Ang obligasyon ay civil o natural.  Obligasyong sibil ay nagbibigay ng hakbang para iutos ang pagsasagawa. Obligasyong natural, ay hindi ayon sa positibong batas ngunit sa equity at natural law, hindi nagbibigay ng karapatan sa isang hakbang para ipatupad ang pagsasagawa, ngunit pagkatapos ng boluntaryong pagsasakatuparan ng may utang , pinapayagan nila ang pagpapanatili ng kung ano mang naibigay o naisagawa para sa kadahilanan nito. May ilang natural obligation ay tinatalaga sa mga susunod na artikulo.

Discussion:

The Code Commissions  stated the reasons for legal recognition of natural obligations –

“In all the specific cases of natural obligations recognized by the present Code, there is a oral but not a legal duty to perform or pay, but the person thus performing or paying feels that in good conscience he should comply with his undertaking, which is based on moral grounds. Why should the law permits him to change his mind, and recovered what he has delivered or paid? It is not wiser and more jut that the law should compel him to abide by his honor and conscience? Equity, morality and natural justice- these are after all, the abiding foundations of a positive law.  A broad policy justifies a legal principle that would encourage persons to fulfill their moral obligations”

Natural Obligations are not written or promulgated laws, but derived merely from reason and nature, based on equity and natural law. They are based on good conscience and compliance to which is anchored on some moral grounds..  When not fulfilled, cannot be enforced in court as they are not legal obligation.

Fulfillment does not refer alone to delivery of things, but also to the performance in the manner that settles a claim. It cover the full extent of the juridical concept of “payment” in Art 1232 “Payment means not only delivery of the money but also performance, in any manner, of the obligation.

Natural Obligations may be converted into civil obligations by acts of novation.

Natural Obligations may be distinguished from Moral obligations:

a)In natural obligations, a juridical tie previously existed between the parties but because of certain intervening causes, they cannot be enforced in court vs in moral obligation there is no juridical tie;

b)In natural obigations, the voluntary fulfillment by the debtor is a legal fulfillment with legal effect vs in moral obligations, the performance is pure act of liberality which springs from blood, affection and benevolence;

c)Natural obligations are within the domain of law vs in moral obligations are within the domain of morals;

d)Natural obligations when fulfilled produce legal effects vs in moral obligations does not produce legal effects.

Natural Obligations may be distinguished from Civil obligations:

a)Natural obligations are based not in positive law but in equity and natural law vs in civil obligations arise from law, contracts, quasi-contracts, delicts and quasi-delicts

b)Natural obligations cannot be enforced in court because the obligee has no right of action to compel performance vs in civil obligations can be enforced in court because the obligee has a right of action to compel performance.

Case Illustration: E. Razon vs. PPA

Article 1424

When a right to sue upon a civil obligation has lapsed by extinctive prescription, the obligor who voluntary performs the contract cannot recover what he has delivered or the value of the service he has rendered.

Kung kalian ang karapatan na magdemanda para sa sibil na obligasyon ay lumipas na para sa taga na preskripsyon, ang obligor na nagkusa na gumawa ng kontrata ay hindi nya na maaaring makuha ang kanyang dinala o ang halaga ng kanyang ginawang serbisyo.

Example:

A’s debt to C has been extinguished by prescription. Yet A, knowing of the prescription, voluntary paid the prescribed debt. A cannot now recover what has paid C. Prescribed debt may indeed give rise to new obligation.

Article 1425

When without the knowledge or against the will of the debtor, a third person pays a debt which the obligor is not legally bound to pay because the action thereon has prescribed, but the debtor later voluntarily reimburses the third person, the obligor cannot recover what he has paid. (n)

Kung hindi alam o labag sa kagustuhan ng may utang, may ibang tao na nagbayad ng utang na hindi naman kinakailangan nang bayaran ng may utang dahil sa ito ay lumipas na, ngunit kusang binayaran ng may utang ang taong nag-abono, hindi na maaaring mabawi ng may utang ang kanyang binayaran. (n)

Discussion:

The assumption in Article 1425 is that the payment was not made as a donation under Article 1238 which would not require a reimbursement.  This pertains to a payment made by a third person as a fulfillment of an obligation.  If payment was made with the consent of the debtor, there would not be a problem because an obligation arises between them.  The payor (third person) becomes the creditor to the debtor.  Therefore, the payor must be reimbursed for what he paid, and in addition to what they had agreed upon.

On the other hand, it’s different when the payment was made, by a third person, without the knowledge or against the will of the debtor.  In which case, the third person can only recover insofar as the payment has been beneficial to the debtor.  Similarly, there is a possibility that the debtor would not receive any benefits at all (when the obligor is no longer legally bound to pay because the action has prescribed) then, the third person will have to suffer the loss.  The remedy will be against the person who received the payment using as basis for his claim the principles of solutio indebiti (Article 1254).

However, if the debtor voluntarily reimburses the third person, the debtor can no longer recover what he has paid.  This is considered as a fulfillment of a voluntary obligation.